ON CONSPIRACY

Wed. October 22, 2003
Categories: Abstract Dynamics

1149.GIF
A presponse to this from Ccru:
To attempt to refute such narratives is to be drawn into a tedious double game. ‘One’ either has to embrace an arbitrary and outrageous cosmic plot (in which everything is being run by the Jews, Masons, Illuminati, CIA, Microsoft, Satan, Ccru…), or alternatively advocate submission to the most mundane construction of quotidian reality, dismissing the hyperstitional chaos that operates beyond the screens (cosmological ‘dark matter’ and ‘dark energy’ – virtual, imperceptible, unknown). This is why atheism is usually so boring.
Both conspiracy and common sense – the ‘normal reality’ script – depend on the dialectical side of the double game, on reflective twins, belief and disbelief, because disbelief is merely the negative complement of belief: cancellation of the provocation, disintensification, neutralization of stimulus – providing a metabolic yawn-break in the double-game.

One Response to “ON CONSPIRACY”

  1. Peter M Says:

    cf terrorism/reformism…